I’ve been absent from here for quite a while.
The recent work load makes me almost no time.
Em, it’s like yester-years when i was in previous co taking on new role.
The feeling is so alike, work-work-work, & more work.
The mood is so different thou, for this round.
i realize, the diference: TIME factor.
i’m no longer (as) young.
i really enjoy the kopi/chat sessions with PALS such as Andrew Wong, Cheryl, Donald, Leon, ST, Vincent Koh, Yan & etc.
Thou conversation ends in “Bye. Take care.”, what they say, constantly & persistently hovering in my brain.
1st sis, Chuan, a doctor, is married.
2nd sis, Fang, a statistics analyst, is getting married 2010.
3rd sis, Cher, a lawyer, is getting married 2011.
Little bro, CK, an IT programmer, is getting married 2010.
Being the eldest, it’s time, i take care of my daddy & mommy in Taipei, by 2011.
If indeed so, i have only 700days more, in Singapore.
i’ll treasure every moment!
i must strive for better,
for family, friends, teammates, myself..
* via pda. 20091125 01:55am. Good night 
Filed under: reflections
1 guy said “Talk is easy”. Yeas, perhaps, to you, not to me.
Compare here, & scroll down. If think “Talk is easy”, dont come by
Filed under: reflections
“Bro, what do you by “let balance run on?”"
K, do a short explanation here:
Since i have take$ on quantity1 (50%+-), i can let balance quantity2 run on.
This “run on”, we’re not sure as where it will go, agree?
If price dowN, exit quantity2 if price hits pre-determine exit such as 3P or entry+2bids
In this case, this quantity2 will not affect the $ i make from quantity1.
If price up UP, exit quantity2 if price hits tp, of course, this is the best
In this case, this quantity2 will still bring me more $, on top of $ from quantity1
The idea is simple: take$, protect$.
Of course, there are other ways, do the one give us the most comfort.
要玩的开心吗。。。
Had dinner with buddies, in pub with them now.
Can see from their face, all bloody moody, as lost$.
The sight pains me, the feeling sucks..
When the best is not even good enough, it is bad, simply..
* via mobile, from HM
Filed under: MIIF (Macquarie International Infrastructure Fund), reflections, yanlord | Tags: MIIF (Macquarie International Infrastructure Fund), reflections, yanlord
| Index | Last | Change | % | High | Low | Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STI | 2666.83 | -27.67 | -1.03% | 2695.31 | 2661.75 | 14:16:15 |
| Hangseng | 21800.95 | -368.64 | -1.66% | 22149.04 | 21788.24 | 12:30:02 |
| Nikkei225 | 10075.05 | -137.41 | -1.35% | 10209.20 | 10060.39 | 15:00:45 |
| SSE | 3020.37 | -1.09 | -0.04% | 3038.06 | 2974.26 | 14:15:45 |
Look at watchlist, only minority green fish (such as DBS, OCBC, KepLand) swimming in this red sea, most are red fish in red sea.
1 bro asked: “Bro, what shall i do?“
Standard reply: if stock SL is hit, just SL, dont wait for miracle!
Of course, i dread this type of situation too.
If you asked me yesterday: ”you “tui” for exiting Yanlord 245 yesterday”
Of course! On Mon, i could have sold 251 easily.
If you asked me now today: ”you “tui” for exiting Yanlord 245 yesterday?”
Of course not! Now is only 234
Let’s just follow what the numbers ask us to do, especially if tide move against us.
Will i long if MIIF 415 diminishing later?
Will i long if my regular stocks reach my identified support?
Yeas, i will. Just follow what the numbers ask us to do.
A trader only know how to long or short, with no SL, is like await to DPP
What’s DPP? “Die pain pain” lah. wahaha..
Of course, sometimes i DPP too. wahaha..
Filed under: reflections
trades till 20091006, red Oct…
20091004, i said in “Dow 20091002 dc. SGX, StraitsAsia 20091002 dc“
“i perceive possible rebound days ahead, but face resis9628 dotted pink“
As at now:
| Index | Last | Change | % | High | Low | Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dow | 9752.71 | 152.96 | 1.59% | 9774.32 | 9601.26 | 11:40:36 |
| NASDAQ | 2106.47 | 38.32 | 1.85% | 2111.13 | 2079.49 | 11:40:37 |
| S&P500 | 1057.82 | 17.36 | 1.67% | 1060.55 | 1042.02 | 11:40:36 |
Well well well..
Did i make lots & loads of $?
Yeas! i make lots & loads of $, away from my pocket! -S$6k.
Note: there is a red symbol -, in front of the number.
i must, again, wait for some setups, to steer my positions back.
Kekeke.. Have not had this kind of nasty situation for a while.
It’s testing. It’s tiring. It’s damaging.
i only glad for 1 thing: i still have 18 trade days in Oct 
SingTel 20091006 2pm sinK from324 to310
i was very tempted to go in SingTel in morning when it past 324 (above yesterday open price).
i decided against it, as i didnt have good cushion in Oct so far, & i would be away for meetings.
When market resumed, i was “Wa! Wat the hell!!!”
SingTel sinK from 324 to 310 in seconds.
What did i do to my mid-term SingTel stocks bought around 319?
i exited 313. Yeah, i could have sold 330 easily 20091001.
But i WAS thinking “SingTel finally break away from box conso 310-330″
Well well well.. Heart pain? 不痛，是假！
That sinKing driver:
Singtel – Bharti stock dives 10%…on India telco watchdog for per-second billing-reports
12:24 06Oct2009 RTRS-India telco watchdog for per-second billing-reports
NEW DELHI, Oct 6 (Reuters) – India’s telecom regulator plans to ask
operators to bill customers on a per-second basis from the the current
per-minute billing, media reported on Tuesday, a move that could hit the
revenue of companies.
Sixth-ranked operator Tata Teleservices [TATASL.UL] had recently
introduced a per-second billing plan for its GSM customers, which helped it
sign up its highest-ever 3.4 million subscribers in August.
Most other operators charge customers for at least a minute even if
they use less than that.
”We may ask all operators to consider the per-second pulse as a
mandatory option along with their other tariff plans,” J.S. Sarma, chairman
of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, was quoted as saying by the
Press Trust of India news agency.
Sarma was speaking on the sidelines of the ITU World Summit in Geneva.
HSBC said in a research report in August per-second billing was the
most “disruptive” plan, and if all operators adopt it the sector’s revenue
could fall by 10-15 percent.
The Economic Times said Sarma did not give a time frame for
implementing the per-second billing plan, but said the regulator would
first issue a consultation paper seeking the industry’s views.
(Writing by Devidutta Tripathy; Editing by Ranjit Gangadharan)
((devidutta.tripathy@thomsonreuters.com; +91 11 4178 1009; Reuters
Messaging: devidutta.tripathy.reuters.com@reuters.net))
Filed under: reflections
1st day of OCT, & my Oct p&l start with big RED,
largely due to SINOMEM SL 625 615.
& that red mark may get bigger, as i still have balance 30k. Other positions cannot help much:
OLAM: exit245, losing transaction
MAPLETREELOG: halted
SINGTEL: dc328 entry319 avg (mid term trade)
Had a very ding-dong SEP, +s$35. Thirty Five dollars.
BAD trades like Rickmers, Jaya, MaryChia, ChinaMilk, AsiaTiger; knocks off
GOOD ones in early-Sep, such as Chartered, TatHong, Olam, FirstResources, GoodPack.
Trading is supposed to be fun.
But, bad results make one go to bed earlier.
That explains why i write from bed now. Wahaha.. Kekeke.. Just kidding.. Kinda tired these 2days.
We still have 21 trade days in Oct.
My 2 bros shall bring me back to GREEN: bro patience & bro discipline
* via mobile
Filed under: AsiaTiger, MapletreeLog, SinoMem, friends, olam, reflections, time sales, trade summary
trades 20090929. The day started with silly mistakes..
Sinomem 20090929 overnight sell queue, was a BUY queue in fact
Wat am i doing???!!!
=====
trades 20090929. The day index fly, my stocks dive
MapletreeLog & Olam are alright.
But, AsiaTiger did roar me to deaf
It did attempt to break that mini box conso, went to DH385, but only briefly,
before tumbled dowN to that descending triangle base 360, went to DL325, DC340
i SL AsiaTiger 355 340.
Trade summary shows those x-deals:
Time&sales had given us some clues, but, seems i was too arrogant.
at 03:57pm when price was 370-375, x-deal 330 5000k
AisaTiger, “Dont mess with AsiaThaiGirl”. Kidding.. 
Talk about that, have not met my Thai friend for quite some time.
She sings well, Kelly Clarkson: Because Of You. Wohoooooooo…
